What is the Annual Maintenance Cost of Kent RO vs Aquaguard?

In India, around 80% of households rely on water purifiers for safe drinking water. As such, selecting the right brand for your water purifier is a crucial decision, especially when considering annual maintenance costs. Two of the most popular brands in India, Kent and Aquaguard, dominate the market with their advanced technology and reliable service. But the cost of maintaining these purifiers can differ significantly, impacting your long-term investment.

Choosing between Kent and Aquaguard isn’t merely a financial decision; it also involves considering the service quality, technology advancements, and overall reliability of the maintenance plans offered by each brand. In this blog, we’ll dive deep into a comparison of their annual maintenance costs (AMC) to help you make an informed decision.

Kent Vs Aquaguard Annual Maintenance Cost (AMC)

Water purifiers require regular maintenance to ensure they continue to deliver safe drinking water. The annual maintenance costs typically include servicing, filter replacement, and general upkeep.

Kent charges approximately ₹5,000 annually for maintenance. This cost covers routine servicing and the replacement of key components. Kent’s technology, which focuses on reducing water wastage, adds value to this price, making it a top choice for environmentally-conscious consumers.

Aquaguard, on the other hand, offers a slightly lower annual maintenance cost of around ₹4,500. Although it doesn’t include water-saving technology like Kent, Aquaguard still delivers reliable performance, focusing on water conservation through other means.

Key Factors to Consider in Annual Maintenance

1. Technology and Water Conservation

Kent is known for its RO technology, which minimizes water wastage during the purification process. The brand’s annual maintenance cost reflects the added investment in this technology. Meanwhile, Aquaguard may have a marginally lower AMC, but it lacks Kent’s advanced water-saving mechanisms.

2. Service Quality

Both brands are recognized for their prompt and efficient customer service. Kent offers a 24/7 helpline, online support, and a mobile service app, making it convenient for users to book service appointments and track maintenance. Aquaguard, while not as digitally advanced, has a wide service network that covers almost all regions in India, providing a personalized service experience.

Kent vs Aquaguard: AMC Coverage and Service Benefits

Let’s take a closer look at what their Annual Maintenance Contracts (AMC) include:

Feature	Kent AMC	Aquaguard AMC
Annual Maintenance Cost	Varies based on plan	Varies based on plan
Service Visits	Unlimited	Limited, based on the plan
Major Components Covered	Filters, RO membrane, electrical parts	Filters, RO membrane, electrical parts
Customer Support	24/7 online support, mobile app	Extensive service network, prompt responses
Additional Benefits	Free replacement of certain parts	Free servicing for specific complaints

AMC Process for Kent and Aquaguard

Both Kent and Aquaguard make it easy to avail their AMC services, though their processes slightly differ:

• Kent AMC Process: Kent offers a three-step online process where customers can input their product details, validate their purchase, and buy the AMC plan. This hassle-free approach ensures that customers don’t face any unexpected hurdles during maintenance.
• Aquaguard AMC Process: Aquaguard provides a more personalized approach, with dedicated customer representatives assisting with AMC purchases and service scheduling. Their focus is on personal interaction rather than digital convenience.

Comparing Costs: Kent vs Aquaguard AMC Pricing

When comparing Kent and Aquaguard’s annual maintenance costs, it’s essential to consider the total value they offer beyond just pricing. Below is a simple comparison of their lowest to highest AMC prices:

Brand	Lowest AMC Cost	Highest AMC Cost
Kent	₹ 675	₹ 6,000
Aquaguard	₹ 599	₹ 6,500

The Impact of AMC on Water Purifier Durability

Purchasing an AMC is crucial for extending the life of your water purifier. Regular maintenance ensures that components like the RO membrane and filters work efficiently and last longer, reducing the need for frequent repairs.

• Kent AMC: Offers free replacements of certain parts and ensures that all components are maintained using genuine parts, enhancing the longevity of your cleaner.
• Aquaguard AMC: Focuses on timely service but offers fewer free replacements, making it a more budget-friendly but slightly less comprehensive option.

Variations in Technician Service Fees

The cost of technician services plays a significant role in determining your water purifier’s annual maintenance budget. These charges can vary depending on the type of service required, the technician’s expertise, and any additional services provided during maintenance. Being mindful of these differences is crucial, as they can influence your decision between opting for a Kent or Aquaguard AMC plan.

Below is the average breakdown of AMC (Annual Maintenance Contract) costs for Kent and Aquaguard RO Water Purifiers:

Service Component	Kent AMC Costs	Aquaguard AMC Costs
Carbon Filter Replacement	₹ 892	₹ 650
RO Membrane Replacement	₹ 1800	₹ 1600
Sediment Filter Replacement	₹ 849	₹ 934
Technician Visit Charge	₹ 450	₹ 500

Wrapping Up

Choosing between Kent and Aquaguard involves more than just comparing their annual maintenance costs. It’s about balancing technology, service quality, and long-term value. While Kent’s higher AMC cost may be justified due to its water-saving technology and digital service support, Aquaguard offers a slightly lower cost with a broader service network. If you prioritize cutting-edge technology and reducing water wastage, Kent’s AMC might be the better choice for you. However, if you are looking for reliable service at a lower price, Aquaguard’s AMC could offer you greater peace of mind. Ultimately, your decision should reflect both your budget and the importance you place on technological advancements and water conservation.

Don’t Miss: Kent vs Aquaguard RO Water Purifier, Which is Better?